When Minneapolis leaders announced plans last year for furloughs of hundreds of city workers amid a pandemic-driven financial crisis, they said they were doing all they could to spread the pain evenly. But in reality, women — especially women of color — bore the brunt of austerity measures designed to help fill an estimated $156 million budget hole, according to a new internal report.
The "action review" found that nearly 72% of the 365 female employees who identify as BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) were forced to take unpaid days off. The as-yet-unpublished report said that the city's cost-saving process had been opaque and needlessly rushed, while failing to live up to the city's publicly stated commitment to racial equity.
"The pandemic was used as the reason this could not have been done as the city was 'bleeding money' that needed to be stopped immediately. Or it was used as an anomaly," wrote the report authored by members of the City Coordinator's Office.
"What is revealed is actually who we really are & who holds the power at the city, what we really value, and how we really feel about our employees, especially those represented by a labor union," it said.
The Star Tribune obtained a copy of the 400-plus-page report, which has been distributed to a number of City Council members and other city staff but won't be presented in public until the June 16 meeting of the Committee of the Whole.
The report argued that while responsibility for deciding where to make cuts was supposed to fall to the head of each department, such decisions were made by the finance and human resources departments, with approval from Mark Ruff, the city coordinator, with little outside input. The process also lacked transparency, the report contended.
"We heard several examples from people at all levels of the organization who came up with alternative plans, using a racial equity lens, to avoid furloughs and were denied the opportunity to implement them by HR and the City Coordinator," the report says.
The report further suggested that such a decisionmaking process violated a 2011 ordinance requiring that furloughs be applied "as equitable as possible," which could conceivably open the city to legal challenges. Instead, the report says, "decisions relating to who would be furloughed was decided upon by finance and HR before departments were instructed to create and maintain furlough plans."