With three of six seats up for grabs, next month's Anoka-Hennepin School Board election could change the makeup of a group that has largely supported the district's controversial Sexual Orientation Curriculum Policy. It's unlikely to put opponents in the majority, however.
In District 5, Scott Wenzel, the board's only outspoken critic of the policy, is running unopposed. District 2 incumbent Marci Anderson is up against two challengers who say they would rescind the policy. Board Chairman Tom Heidemann, representing District 1, faces an opponent who does not appear to be campaigning for the position.
The policy, which allows teachers to discuss issues involving sexual orientation but requires them to remain neutral, has been a major point of contention in the district, which itself has been under a microscope over its handling of issues related to gay and lesbian students. A lawsuit filed during the summer seeks repeal of the "neutrality policy," contending in part that it does not adequately shield students from bullying based on sexual orientation. District attorneys and the plaintiffs have participated in several mediation sessions, and have reported progress.
Three school board members -- John Hoffman, Michael Sullivan and Kathy Tingelstad -- are not up for re-election until 2014. Like Anderson and Heidemann, they historically have supported the neutrality policy, although sitting members have been barred from discussing the policy in the media pending the outcome of the lawsuit.
Anderson's opponents -- Mary Nelson and Randy Kolb, both of Blaine -- said they were moved to run after watching the district's struggles with the policy. Heidemann's opponent, Darin Rorman, has not taken a public position.
The policy is not the only issue in the race, of course. The five candidates interviewed by the Star Tribune generally agreed that school funding is a vital issue in the state's largest district, as it wrestles with uncertainties in state aid. They support a $48 million levy renewal going before voters on Election Day. For the most part, they agreed that the district has done its best to control spending, including a move to close eight schools last year at an annual savings of $2.9 million.
Anderson, finishing her first four-year term, noted that the time the board spends getting its pennies in line and preparing for the vagaries of the state Legislature could be better spent. (Lawmakers this year delayed $700 million in statewide school funding, after a 2010 delay of $1.4 billion.) She suggested more emphasis on looking for ways to be innovative -- not just in funding, but in academics, and narrowing the achievement gap.
The candidates agreed, also, that negative light from the lawsuit has overshadowed a strong fiscal record, a relatively smooth redistricting process and other progress, including a new data system that could help target resources to the students who need it most.