"But is old, old, good old Christmas gone? Nothing but the hair of his good, old, gray head and beard left?"
With those words, a popular American writer launched into a protest about how Christmas simply isn't what it used to be. Then he diagnosed what's gone wrong:
"The world has become more worldly," he wrote. "There is more dissipation, and less enjoyment. Pleasure has expanded into a broader, but a shallower stream; forsaking deep and quiet channels ... of domestic life."
The antique language may give the game away. But if shallow worldliness, and too many pleasures of the wrong kind, sound like distinctive 21st-century disadvantages, consider that our essayist, Washington Irving, was grumbling about such newfangled disorders in … 1818.
This complaint, it seems, is just another cherished Yuletide tradition, hardly altered in nearly 200 years. It's been almost a quarter century since I last felt compelled to excavate Irving's "Old Christmas" essays. Then, too, a sour national mood made me want to reassure readers that they needn't despair just because the approaching holiday doesn't seem like "what it used to be."
Christmas has basically never been "what it used to be." Somehow, that feeling is the point of Christmas, and always was.
Certainly, this past year (or so) has been hard — marred by violence and strife of various kinds, near and far, from police shootings to terrorism to an unwelcome uptick in ordinary street crime.
Our politics, too, have been wounding. If you don't cringe a bit looking ahead to the rest of the 2016 election debate, you are either part of the polarizing problem or you're not paying attention.