NEW YORK — An 89-year-old heir convicted of helping himself to his mother's fortune was told Thursday to be prepared to start his prison term a day later after years of appeals, and the former lawyer convicted of aiding him was led away in handcuffs.
A judge turned down a request for a new trial for Anthony Marshall, who's the son of the late philanthropist Brooke Astor, and for co-defendant Francis Morrissey Jr. But Marshall had asked an appeals court to let him stay free on bail longer while it considered his argument that his health is so poor that it would be unjust to jail him.
His lawyer, Kenneth Warner, said Thursday evening that Marshall would have to surrender for prison because an appeals court had turned down a request for bail during further appeals; information wasn't immediately available from the court.
In a case that's had lots of legal maneuvering, it wasn't immediately clear whether Marshall might have further avenues to try to forestall prison. But for now, Marshall is due in court Friday afternoon and could well be on the verge of starting the one- to three-year prison sentence imposed on him and Morrissey in December 2009. It came after a trial that examined the finances and final years of the woman seen as the epitome of New York society.
Astor — whose third husband was a descendant of one of the one of the United States' first multimillionaires, John Jacob Astor — was renowned for her gifts to a roster of New York institutions. She was 105 when she died in 2007; she had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease.
The Manhattan district attorney's office said Marshall, her only child, exploited her mental decline to use her money to give himself gifts and to mastermind changes to her will. His lawyers said that he had legal authority for the gifts and that Astor deliberately altered her will.
Marshall was excused from court Thursday, but some jurors were on hand as a downcast Morrissey, 72, heard that he would have to start serving his term. Morrissey was convicted of forging Astor's signature on a change to her will. His defense argued that if the signature was phony, he knew nothing of it.
Some jurors marveled after court at the time the appeals have taken.