Discussions about fire service in Northfield and the rural communities it serves have gone on for years. Now leaders hope a new agreement is near.
The Northfield Fire Department since the 1950s has had an agreement with the Northfield Rural Fire Protection District to provide service to Dundas and six area townships — Bridgewater, Forest, Greenvale, Sciota, Waterford and Webster — under a contract that hasn't been updated in 43 years.
For the past 14 years, the city and the Fire Protection District have had on-and-off negotiations about a new contract. And for the past year, a task force has studied options for long-term fire service, including new cost allocations and proposals for who has a say in fire operations.
"It's a matter of voice and getting more consistent funding for equipment," said Northfield Mayor Dana Graham.
Two sticking points have held up negations: Rural Fire is concerned with how the city buys fire trucks and wants the townships to have a say in when and how they are purchased; the city, meanwhile, is concerned that it "was providing more operating costs that weren't necessarily compensated by Rural," said Erica Zweifel, a Northfield City Council member who is also a member of the task force.
But a bigger question is what will happen if a key option is chosen — consolidating the governance of the Northfield Fire Department into a joint powers agreement, made up of Northfield, Dundas and the rural district.
Although Northfield would have the majority membership because it would be the largest entity in the joint powers, some city officials aren't so sure about the change. Representation would consist of five members from Northfield, three from the rural district and one from Dundas.
"It would no longer be a city fire department, and that's a big change," Zweifel said. "The city of Northfield Fire Department would go away, and it would be something else. Our attorney has advised us: Be very sure about what you're doing. Because we have the greatest population and would have the greatest impact should the JPA [joint powers agreement] fail.