A week after the first Republican presidential debates and one candidate generated enough waves with his performance to generate headlines for the past seven days: Donald Trump.
While the debate lived up to all the hype, let's not kid ourselves: It was not a reincarnation of the Lincoln–Douglas Debates of 1858.
Trump's confrontation with Fox News moderator Megyn Kelly during the debate and his post-debate comments criticizing Kelly have garnered more publicity than any substantive policy position taken by Trump or other candidate during the debates.
Since last week's debate, there has been discussion in Republican circles about excluding Trump from future Republican National Committee sanctioned debates.
Removing Trump from the debates would be impossible for numerous reasons, but as former U.S. Senator Norm Coleman told me, it would be a political mistake to exclude Trump as it plays into his "mantra" of battling the political establishment.
Coleman, who is supporting U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham's candidacy, described Trump to me as "all bombast and no substance." Coleman added the upcoming debates "hopefully … will expose Trump for who he is."
In an interview on FOX News last evening, Charles C.W. Cooke with National Review aptly described Trump's candidacy as "performance art."
Minnesota's own "performance art" politician, former Governor Jesse Ventura said this week he hopes Trump wins the Republican nomination for president and … wait for it … Ventura would consider being Trump's running-mate.