A new ordinance to discourage euthanizing cats and dogs at animal shelters has put St. Paul in the middle of a national debate over how best to deal with the pervasive issue of stray and abandoned animals.
Surprisingly, the debate is pitting the "no-kill" shelter movement — which praises the St. Paul measure — against the formidable animal rights group PETA.
Last week, the City Council unanimously approved a policy to require shelters to take steps to find a home for healthy, even-tempered cats or dogs before they can be euthanized. That makes St. Paul apparently the first Minnesota city to pass such a measure. Minneapolis is developing a similar proposal for introduction before the City Council sometime next year.
From now on, it won't be enough for St. Paul shelters to simply wait out the state's required five-day holding period before putting down an animal. They will have to work with a veterinarian to ensure that they tried to save the animal by placing it in a home, or least explain why they didn't — whether because of space, staff or budget issues.
"I don't think people realize what a really big deal this is," said Council President Kathy Lantry, who sponsored the ordinance and worked with local shelters to develop a proposal they could back.
However, opponents such as PETA believe that restricting euthanasia will result in overcrowded shelters, exposing more animals to disease and aggressive cage mates.
The Animal Humane Society, which operates one of its five metro-area shelters in St. Paul, had opposed a similar bill which was introduced (and failed) during the last two legislative sessions.
But it endorsed the St. Paul ordinance because it gave shelter officials greater flexibility in making euthanasia decisions, said Kathy Mock, who directs government affairs and community engagement for the Animal Humane Society.