Q Your preference for plasma TVs is clear, and I like their picture quality. Do you have information comparing the energy consumption of these newer plasmas with LCD TVs? When I shop for a plasma HDTV, how can I tell whether I'm looking at one of the newer, lower-energy-use models?
KATY O'SULLIVAN, BRIMSON, MINN.
A Check out CNET's online chart showing the power consumption and annual cost to run many HDTVs (reviews.cnet.com/green-tech/tv-consumption-chart). Figures are given for out-of-the-box picture settings and with the picture set for a more accurate image. Subscribers to Consumer Reports' website (www.consumerreports.org) also can see the annual cost to run different TV models.
They show that with the more energy-efficient plasma models, the difference in consumption compared with LCD is negligible. In most comparisons I made, the plasma adds only $1 to $3 per month to your electric bill compared with a comparably sized LCD model. In some cases, plasmas cost less than comparably sized LCD models.
According to Consumer Reports, its recommended Panasonic TC-42P42X1 42-inch plasma costs $29 a year to run, using less energy than every 42-inch and 40-inch LCD model it tested.
The charts on these sites will help you find the green HDTV of your dreams. But if you don't want to do a lot of research, the Panasonic models using its NeoPDP technology tend to be the most energy-efficient plasmas on the market and are a good place to start.
Finally, if you break it down to monthly cost, the difference between all of them isn't that great. The most power-hungry 60-inch plasma tested by Consumer Reports had $99 in annual energy costs. Tested 37-inch LCD models averaged $32 per year. That is less than $6 per month.
Try an IR repeater Q Is there a way to remotely control a cable box that is out of sight?