Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
The Minneapolis Police Department's long history of troubled relations with communities it's supposed to serve demonstrates the need for significant, meaningful input from citizens about police conduct. The city needs a civilian review process that the public can trust.
And most recently, input about MPD officer conduct has been on hold. The existing system has done nothing since March 2022, when the chair and other members quit — leaving the body without enough members to make decisions.
Now city officials are considering a new plan for civilian police review that isn't perfect but would move things in the right direction.
The proposed ordinance would replace the current oversight structure that includes the Office of Police Conduct Review and the Police Conduct Oversight Commission. Instead of operating under the two groups, which caused confusion in the past, the two bodies would merge into the Community Commission on Police Oversight (CCPO). It would consist of 15 civilian members: eight appointed by the City Council and seven by the mayor.
Under the plan, all commission members could participate in smaller review panels, consisting of three civilians and two officers, to consider citizen complaints against police and make recommendations about police policies and procedures. The panels would make recommendations to the police chief, who would decide whether disciplinary action should be taken against officers.
During a presentation to a City Council committee this week, just over a dozen people testified against the plan, arguing that it doesn't go far enough to give citizens power. Members of Communities United Against Police Brutality (CUAPB) argued for an all-civilian group without officer participation. And they suggested that the civilian review group be elected by the public, not appointed by city officials.