Last week, Mayor R.T. Rybak tweeted the following message: "Number 1 again! Minneapolis ranked top city for drivers by Delivery Times Magazine due to abundance of bike lanes."
Bicycle delivery people across the city no doubt did wheelies over the news. But as I sat in a traffic jam on my way home from work this week, looking wistfully at the empty bike lane next to me that used to be for cars, I had to wonder if everyone was so jubilant.
It's hard to argue against creating safer biking paths in the cities, or against the fact that biking is good for you and the environment. I bought a new bike last year and like to ride it around town. I like the new lanes when I'm riding my bike.
But last week I kept track of the number of bikes I saw in the new bike lanes on my way to work. I counted three. All week. Like a lot of other drivers, I've also frequently been flummoxed on what to do when my car lane suddenly becomes a bike lane, or has a large painting of a bike in it.
I am apparently not alone. I checked comments on a recent story we did about a new bike lane in south Minneapolis.
Here is one: "19th Ave S, the 10th Ave bridge, and 10th Ave. SE are now a complete mess. [There are] bottlenecks that were apparently designed to discourage drivers and divert them to [nonexistent] alternate routes. "
And another: "Riverside Avenue, the Franklin Avenue bridge and Marshall Avenue in St. Paul are frequently jammed with cars backed up for blocks. Sitting there in traffic, looking at a wide open empty lane next to me is frustrating. I think bike commuting is great, but the engineering of these new bike paths is ridiculous. It's just not working. Traffic flow is in a dead stop."
And another: "The whole bike thing is totally out of control in Minneapolis and the city leaders need a reality check before moving forward to give these bikers more psycho biking freedom."