Air travel: Please profile passengers
A Jan. 2 letter questions whether profiling will really help or only discriminate against completely innocent people in regard to attacks by terrorists on the airlines. I, for one, vote for profiling.
A little over two years ago my husband and I took a trip to the United Kingdom. When we were checked in by British Airlines personnel in Chicago we were pulled to the side and had our passports taken away from us. For close to an hour we were questioned and scrutinized. When all was done, we asked what could possibly be the reason that two senior citizens of Scandinavian descent would cause alarm bells to go off. We were told it was because our last name started with Al. In the end it really proved to be nothing but a bit of an inconvenience, and British Airlines actually upgraded our seats because we proved to be such good sports.
I've always believed that if you have nothing to hide then you have no reason to feel that you're being discriminated against. Especially at a time when so much is at stake. Perhaps it's time for the American Civil Liberties Union to branch out and to get into the airline business. Then all those folks who feel as if their civil liberties are being violated, or who don't like being profiled can fly on ACLU Airlines. As for me, bring on the profiling.
CAROLYN ALM, CHISAGO CITY, MINN.
•••
Please help me understand! The CIA ignored warnings about the latest airplane terrorist, he was not an American citizen, he traveled on an international flight, he had no luggage, he bought a one-way ticket with cash.
To solve the problem we now pat down citizen grandma flying to visit the grandkids on a domestic flight on a ticket purchased with a credit card and won't let her read a book or go to the bathroom during the last hour of the flight.
I suggest we save the TARP money to nationalize the airlines because domestic airline travel is sure to suffer greatly.