Judge James Rosenbaum, in his review of the William McGuire settlement, asks the Minnesota Supreme Court what he can do (Star Tribune, Dec. 28). Here is my suggestion on how to untangle the legal wrangle surrounding McGuire's stash of $874 million in stock options:
Invite all the UnitedHealth insured and staff to a gathering at the Minneapolis Convention Center or the Xcel Arena (lunch provided by you-know-who) and have McGuire stand before the assembled citizens and explain why he thinks he is worth all that money. Their response -- claps, positive, boos, negative -- will determine the outcome. Surely he would welcome this opportunity to resolve the distress this situation is placing on him and his family.
WAYNE L. HORNICEK, SHOREVIEW
Voters Alliance concern is misplaced I am one of those senior citizens (age 77) for whom the Minnesota Voters Alliance believes that instant-runoff voting would be too complicated to figure out. My goodness, I can't understand how I learned to use a computer, a VCR, a DVD player and the multitude of other push-button gadgets that have entered our lives. That does not include the countless forms and questionnaires having to do with retirement, health care, etc., that older adults have to complete.
The insult is made worse by saying that we wouldn't have the brains to consult an election judge with any questions that we may have.
I have been waiting my entire adult life for a fairer voting procedure and finally we have it.
VONNIE THOMASBERG, MINNEAPOLIS
God's views on gays and lesbians I read the Dec. 29 Counterpoint titled, "The delicate balance between kindness and complicity." A better title would have been, "The stilted, tortured, indeterminable and incomprehensible line between Catholic teaching and real life."