The South Washington County and Stillwater school districts have had a lot in common when it comes to asking voters for new funding.
In November 2013, both won approval of operating-levy requests aimed at strengthening school security and their respective bottom lines.
Now, the two neighbors are readying bond proposals addressing long-range facility needs. Their pitches are likely to come before voters at different times — Stillwater's in the spring and South Washington County's most likely in the fall — but again there are similarities.
One is especially tricky. Both districts covet Valley Crossing Community School, now a unique collaborative of three districts, as an answer to their elementary space needs. But the question of who owns that building — if, indeed, an agreement can be reached to allow one district to take it over — is not likely to be settled soon.
Ideas on how best to accommodate students in the middle-school years also have emerged as key features of the plans. South Washington County wants to build a new Oltman Middle School. Stillwater has proposed reconfiguring the bridge between the elementary and high school years from the current grades 7-9 to the more popular grades 6-8 model.
The biggest difference between the plans is their potential immediate cost to taxpayers.
Stillwater is considering a $90-million-plus proposal that would require no increase in what taxpayers currently pay to cover building-related debts. That's because the new bond would replace debt set to expire in the next four years, Superintendent Tom Nelson said.
"We're calling it 'tax neutral,' " he said.