As the St. Paul City Council gets ready to decide whether to allow "granny flats" citywide, the only neighborhood group to object is the realm of the carriage house.
The Summit Hill Association, which represents neighborhoods graced by some of the city's most stately and historic homes, is urging the City Council to hold off on a Wednesday vote that would allow homeowners on lots of at least 5,000 square feet to build what are called accessory dwelling units, or ADUs.
In an Aug. 10 e-mail to the City Council, the Summit Hill Association said the city needs to adequately study how the units will affect parking, traffic, neighborhood character or property values. One longtime resident worries that decades of historic preservation will be undone.
What's not clear is whether that opposition will make a difference.
In fact, the line behind citywide expansion has been growing for months, ever since the City Council in February asked staff members to study allowing units in additional neighborhoods as a way of adding affordable housing. Since then, the Planning Commission, a number of other district councils, the St. Paul Area Association of Realtors and the St. Paul Advisory Committee on Aging all have expressed support for allowing ADUs citywide.
Andy Rorvig, president of the Summit Hill Association, said Tuesday that the city has not taken enough time nor done enough study to determine if ADUs would be a positive for every neighborhood. While he acknowledged that there are many supporters of the idea in Summit Hill, there is very little data to show their potential benefits — or detriments.
"What we're saying is we need some time to get everybody's input," he said.
Nancy O'Brien Wagner, a historian who lives with her architect husband on Linwood Avenue, said she opposes the expansion for one main reason: "For us, it's an issue of keeping the historic nature of the neighborhood," she said.