OMAHA, Neb. — A Nebraska law that combined abortion restrictions with another measure to limit gender-affirming health care for minors does not violate a state constitutional amendment requiring bills to stick to a single subject, a majority of the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Friday.
The state's high court acknowledged in its ruling that abortion and gender-affirming care ''are distinct types of medical care,'' but found the law does not violate Nebraska's single-subject rule because both abortion and transgender health fall under the subject of medical care.
The majority relied, in part, on a passage from an 1895 ruling to find the state constitution offers wide latitude on what composes a single subject.
''Ultimately, ‘if a bill has but one general object, no matter how broad that object may be, and contains no matter not germane thereto, and the title fairly expresses the subject of the bill, it does not violate''' the state constitution's single-subject rule, Chief Justice Mike Heavican wrote for the court.
The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union representing Planned Parenthood of the Heartland challenging the law that has restricted abortion to 12 weeks of pregnancy, banned gender-confirming surgery and restricted the use of hormone treatments in transgender minors since 2023. The high court rejected arguments by ACLU attorneys which argued the hybrid law passed last year violates Nebraska's single subject rule.
Republican lawmakers in the officially nonpartisan Nebraska Legislature had originally proposed separate bills: An abortion ban at about six weeks of pregnancy and a bill restricting gender-affirming treatment for minors. The GOP-dominated Legislature added a 12-week abortion ban to the existing gender-affirming care bill only after the six-week ban failed to defeat a filibuster.
The combination law was the Nebraska Legislature's most controversial in the 2023 session, and its gender-affirming care restrictions triggered an epic filibuster in which a handful of lawmakers sought to block every bill for the duration of that session — even ones they supported — in an effort to stymie it.
A district judge dismissed the lawsuit last August, and the ACLU appealed.