Some Minneapolis City Council members are concerned that a revamp of the city's goals is out of touch with the work the city is already doing — and in some cases, more about sweeping, unattainable goals than measurable progress.
In a committee meeting Wednesday, council members got an update on a proposed list of "community indicators," which would serve as benchmarks to check how well the city is doing on meeting its goals.
The more than two dozen indicators cover a range of topics from transportation (measuring the percentage of residents who live within a half-mile of transit routes and bikeways) to wages (charting the "average monthly earning of employees with stable jobs.")
Those measures would then be used as a framework for regular reports through the city's Results Minneapolis program, a transparency initiative that has been on hold while officials retooled it to include the new indicators.
While some council members applauded the proposal, others pushed back.
Council Member Lisa Goodman, who called the measures for progress on affordable housing "grossly inadequate," said she and others who have made housing a focus were not consulted by the City Coordinator's Office when it was coming up with the new measures. After other council members asked for more time on the matter so city staff members could consult with council members, Goodman said she feared those meetings wouldn't results in any changes.
The council member said she's unhappy that so much of the city's planning on big-picture issues, including housing, is directed by people in the City Coordinator's Office who aren't involved in hands-on work on specific topics.
"I can operate and represent my ward and lead on housing without any of this," Goodman said of the proposed community indicators, "and I will."