WASHINGTON -- Senate liberals pushing for new government social programs once worried that their conservative opponents would talk their agenda to death. The weapon of choice was the filibuster, and it conjured up images of bleary-eyed senators dozing on cots in the marbled hallways of the U.S. Capitol.
They've done away with the cots, but one of the central characters in the filibuster story is the same: Walter F. Mondale, the former Minnesota senator and vice president of the United States.
After three decades, the 82-year-old Mondale was back in the Senate on Wednesday, working to soften rules that allow a determined minority to tie the "world's greatest deliberative body" into knots. In 1975 Mondale led the move to end debate on controversial measures with only 60 votes rather than 67 -- the standard that had been used to end filibusters for nearly a century.
But this time, Mondale's gray eminence is entering a more acrimonious 21st-century Senate, where both sides in the partisan divide routinely accuse one another of stalling, obstruction and generally abusing the rules of debate.
The Senate now averages two votes a week to cut off debate. Between 1917 and 1971 the average was one. A year.
At the same time, some judicial nominees find themselves put on "hold" for months, even years.
"What we see now is a logical extension of the paralysis we faced in 1975," Mondale told a Senate panel exploring parliamentary changes.
Mondale's testimony came hours before the Senate voted to end debate on a landmark Wall Street regulation bill and two months after a blistering battle over health care that nearly spelled abject failure for the Democrats because of the GOP's constant filibuster threat.