Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Rochelle Olson’s interview with Minnesota Legislative Auditor Judy Randall (“Legislative auditor: Fraud will get worse before it gets better,” Oct. 5) seemed, despite its headline, to offer a ray of hope that the Walz administration is — maybe, finally — doing something about the problem of fraud in Minnesota government programs.
This is good news because, make no mistake about it, the theft of millions of tax dollars from Minnesota programs resulted not just from the actions of thieves but also from the failure of state executive officials to implement basic financial safeguards recommended in numerous audit reports for several years.
State officials, particularly in the Minnesota Department of Human Services but in other departments as well, allowed community organizations to administer important programs without first verifying that they were trustworthy. Then state officials failed to verify claims from these organizations that they were serving hundreds, even thousands, of people in their communities.
As we know from investigations and prosecutions, particularly by federal officials, a significant number of people in these organizations were not serving. They were stealing not just from taxpayers but also from families in their own communities. As a result, families — particularly Somali families — did not receive the food, child care or other state-funded services that they needed and that taxpayers had paid for. Added to this betrayal, people in these community organizations were using the stolen money to buy expensive homes, automobiles and other personal items for themselves.
Despite the federal, and some county, investigations and prosecutions, the state’s negligence allowed people in these sham organizations to continue to use their simple theft scheme repeatedly in child care programs, food programs, housing programs and others. This egregious lack of oversight by state officials has also deepened public mistrust in government.
While executive officials were obviously negligent, less obvious is the fact that some key legislators tried to minimize the fraud problem and shield the Department of Human Services and the Walz administration from criticism.