If your initial reaction to the six finalists for our next Minnesota state flag was "meh," give it time. You might just get to "marvelous."
My own sentiments about the designs have evolved after feeling underwhelmed at first glance. Like other Minnesotans, I found them too childish. Too corporate. Too logo-y.
And allow me to say my piece about the lack of a loon, pine tree or lady's slipper on any of the Top 6. These images were deemed too North Woods, and thereby not inclusive, by some members of the 17-member flag commission who hail from the southern and more agricultural part of the state.
"I've never seen a loon in southern Minnesota," remarked Rep. Bjorn Olson, R-Fairmont, at the panel's Nov. 21 meeting.
But these things are quintessentially Minnesota. They are our official state bird, state tree and state flower, and deservedly so. They are icons that immediately connect us to this wondrous place. Most of us would feel proud to fly a flag with a loon because that bird with its haunting call symbolizes our cherished lakes and vast wilderness, even if we happen to live in a city condo. No offense to southern Minnesotans, but a picture of a soybean wouldn't stir the souls of most Minnesotans the way a loon or red pine could.
That said, I'm warming up to the final designs.
Are they simple? Yes. That is, well, by design.
"The flag should be so simple that a child can draw it from memory and can be easily recognizable from a distance," reads the design brief adopted by the commission months ago, before the first drawing was submitted. It's not surprising that voting members are gravitating toward clean, uncluttered representations, because simplicity is a cardinal rule of what makes a good flag.