Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
You might think a region that boasts as many fine restaurants as the Twin Cities would be able to hold its head high among other centers of gastronomic excellence. Consider the James Beard nominations and awards that pepper the resumes of prominent local chefs. Consider Owamni, the subject of a 2022 New Yorker headline: "How Owamni became the best new restaurant in the United States."
But these Minnesota giants of culinary art lack one credential proudly displayed by their peers in Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C. — one or more Michelin stars. The reason is simple: There is no Michelin Guide for Minnesota.
Does it matter? To the restaurateur elite, the answer is yes. Gavin Kaysen, owner and chef of a group of first-rank Minneapolis restaurants, once was top chef in a restaurant with a Michelin star. He told an editorial writer that the star's effect on a restaurant goes beyond simple prestige.
Kaysen explained that a star need not be merely won; once won, it must be maintained. Michelin inspectors come back to make sure that the establishment's standards haven't slipped. They do their work incognito, and Michelin goes to extreme lengths to keep their identities secret.
A continuing star, Kaysen said, assures customers that a restaurant continues to operate at the highest level. "Just because you get it doesn't mean you get it next year," he said. "You have to maintain those one, two or three stars, every single year. That's a lot of pressure."
And yet it's a pressure he considers a privilege. He'd like Minneapolis to follow the recent example of Denver and cook up a deal to bring Michelin to Minnesota. That's a worthwhile idea.