Coronavirus vaccine is not all that's in short supply worldwide.
Trustworthy, truthful journalism — the "main vaccine against disinformation," according to Reporters Without Borders — is completely or partly blocked in 73% of the 180 nations ranked in the organization's 2021 World Press Freedom Index, which was released this week.
Only 7% of nations have a "good" environment for journalism, a grim, slim sliver compared with the 20% deemed "fairly good," the 33% labeled "problematic," the 29% considered "bad" and the 12% "very bad" for press freedom. And because so many of the latter categories are representative of more densely populated African or Asian nations like China (177th, just behind the world's worst places for media freedom: Eritrea, North Korea and Turkmenistan), the proportion of people denied the disinformation vaccine of a free press is even more egregious.
In the Middle East and North Africa, which remain "the toughest and most dangerous for journalists," the pandemic has "exacerbated the problems of a press that is already in its death throes," the report stated. Overall, Africa "continues to be the most violent continent for journalists," and brutality in Belarus is among the reasons Eastern Europe and Central Asia were ranked second lowest.
Europe and the Americas are the continents with the best environment for press freedom, but Reporters Without Borders notes that the Americas had the most significant deterioration in the regional violations score. Portions of Europe were worthy of concern, too, including in notable nations like Germany (13th), France (34th) and Italy (41st). But in what's become an annual, expected exception, Scandinavian nations led the list (Norway, Finland, Sweden and Denmark ranked first through fourth, respectively). This performance, the report states "clearly confirms the success of the 'Nordic model' in upholding press freedom."
Benjamin Bigelow, an assistant professor of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Minnesota, said that journalism is an integrated component of a "holistic social model, or a sort of ideal of how societies should function."
This media-society symbiosis relies on trust, said Poul Houe, a U professor emeritus of Scandinavian Languages and Literature. Houe, who hails from Denmark, said in an e-mail exchange that "The shaft that drives this societal engine is public trust," which he said is high in Scandinavia. "People are inclined to trust, not only other people, but news and unfamiliar facts — until reasons for not doing so become tangible — as well as government and the authorities responsible for the public's right to freely assess and articulate its take on both."
Trust, said Bigelow, "goes both ways, where there's a recognition that the public trust you, so you have to maintain that trust."