The Land of 100,000 Cabins could be tested by tax reform.
The portion of the House Republican tax proposal that curtails homebuying incentives appears likely to hit Minnesota harder than most states.
That's because the vast majority of cabins in central and northern Minnesota are second homes, which would no longer be eligible for a deduction on mortgage interest under the House GOP tax plan that was unveiled Nov. 2.
Senate Republicans last week unveiled a different tax reform plan that makes no change to mortgage interest deductions. But the markup and voting of tax legislation always starts in the House, creating more debate around the tax ideas on that side of Congress.
"This could impact Minnesota more than anywhere else in the country," said Jeff Forester, executive director of Minnesota Lakes and Rivers Advocates. "It would have a big impact on places that can tolerate it the least."
Across the state, there were 105,000 seasonal cabins and 237,597 residential non-homesteaded properties in 2015. And in Cook, Cass and Aitkin counties, seasonal cabins outnumber year-round homesteads, according to the Department of Revenue.
Thousands of other Minnesotans — snowbirds among them — own houses, condos and getaways in other parts of the country and would lose the ability to deduct their borrowing costs on them.
Mortgage interest deductions emerged in the 1920s and 1930s out of deductions that were originally aimed at business interest, the primary form of borrowing back then. Economists have long criticized the tax breaks for mortgage interest, saying they encourage overinvestment in housing and chiefly benefit the relatively well-off.