They came with fishing poles and seed caps and dragged along some giant puppets and a couple little kids dressed as bumblebees for fun. Unlike many demonstrations at the governor's residence, however, the mood music for the morning was positive and encouraging rather than hostile.
Leave it to the Pollinate Minnesota to recognize that you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
In this case, the hundred or so people from a coalition of environmental groups were trying to attract the attention of the state's top fly, Gov. Mark Dayton, who came outside for a chat as soon as the protesters started gathering on his doorstep.
They knew they had a sympathetic ear in Dayton, who had pushed hard for one of his top priorities, a mandatory buffer zone around rivers and streams to better protect them from agriculture runoff. His compromised victory on the issue however (one group called it "lipstick on a pig") had put him between a rock and a hardwood. The modest success made it nearly impossible for Dayton to veto the bill, which most environmentalists say sets the state back years, even decades, in other areas.
"It's terrible in terms of cuts, "said Paul Sobocinski, a farmer from Wabasso. "In my 20 years going to the Legislature it's the worst I've ever seen. You have a budget surplus and yet you're shorting the PCA [Minnesota Pollution Control Agency]? How ridiculous."
When the session ended and the dust settled, environmental activists discovered a deep ledger of bills designed to promote industry over land and water, finance over forests. Most of them were agreed to by a handful of people in the infamous "cone of silence" in the final days of the session, or disguised in linguistic legerdemain at the bottom of the thick bill passed out in the waning seconds of the session.
Bobby King, policy program director from the Land Stewardship Project, cited as an example the motion that eliminated the Pollution Control Agency's 48-year-old Citizens' Board, seen by this crowd as one of the few venues where they can raise their voices on environmental matters.
No one recalls the elimination of the board ever being discussed in the Legislature, and the board itself was never mentioned in the bill. Instead, it was among a batch of repeals that simply cited the numbers of the bill to be repealed. Activists saw the numbers only minutes before the vote, and didn't have time to look any of them up.