Minnesota Court of Appeals: Fear of harm no defense against losing driver's license for DWI

June 10, 2013 at 10:35PM

ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Court of Appeals says fear of harm is not a defense against losing one's driver's license for drunken driving.

The case involved a Monticello couple who got into a drunken argument at a Mora resort that turned physical back at their family cabin. After Jennifer Axelberg took refuge in her car, Jason Axelberg punched the windshield. Fearing for her safety, she drove back to the resort where a bystander called police. He was arrested on suspicion of domestic assault while she was arrested on suspicion of driving while impaired. The state revoked her license for a year.

In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court said state law has never recognized the "necessity defense" against a driver's license revocation for drunken driving.

Jennifer Axelberg's attorney, Ryan Pacyga, said he thought the appellate court "took a step backward" in the way it handled victims of domestic assault. He said he would ask the Minnesota Supreme Court to review the case.

about the writer

about the writer

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.