David Salisbury has struggled for decades with mental health problems, but an outburst that involved throwing a television at the back door nearly two years ago landed the Alexandria man in jail — not in a hospital or treatment facility. Ever since, the Salisburys have been protesting the way police handled the incident.
Now they've learned that the state Department of Human Rights will not take their side in the dispute.
In a decision dated Dec. 29, the agency found no probable cause that the Alexandria police officers who went to the Salisburys' house in February 2015 engaged in discrimination on the basis of Salisbury's disability.
All three officers had some level of crisis intervention training to help de-escalate conflicts, the decision noted, and the officer who drove Salisbury to jail took the course "Protecting and Serving People with Disabilities."
The decision noted that state law gives officers the discretion to take a mentally ill person to a treatment facility if the person is in danger of injuring themselves or others if not immediately detained — but the law does not require it.
The Salisburys' case comes amid mounting concerns over relying on police to respond to mental health emergencies and the high number of mentally ill people caught up in the criminal justice system. Mental health advocate Sue Abderholden, head of NAMI Minnesota, said Salisbury's ordeal is all too familiar. Most people have no idea they can tap a mental health crisis team for such emergencies.
Alexandria Police Chief Richard Wyffels said the agency's ruling pleased him. There were safety risks, he said, and if the mentally ill person is acting out, the first stop is going to be jail. Wyffels said he saw the incident as a domestic situation, with the son and wife in harm's way.
"Our officers are very sensitive to mental illness and know this is part of the world we live in," Wyffels said. "The police did their job in this case."