Depending on who is talking, Minneapolis' $20 filing fee for candidates running for mayor, City Council or other offices is either a reasonably low barrier that ensures nearly anyone can participate in politics — or an outdated standard that can turn municipal elections into a mess.
Minneapolis voters will decide Tuesday whether the rule will stand or whether the threshold should increase for the 2017 city elections. Ballot question No. 1 asks whether the city should amend its charter to increase the fee to $500 for mayoral candidates, $250 for council and $100 for the Board of Estimate and Taxation and the Park and Recreation Board.
Rather than coming up with the money, potential candidates could instead gather the signatures of registered voters: either 500 or a number equal to 5 percent of the total votes cast in the previous election for the office.
Interest in increasing the fee, which has been at the same level since 1967, peaked after last year's mayoral election. The race drew 35 candidates, ended with a lengthy vote-counting process and contributed to pushing the cost of the city elections more than $400,000 over the approved $1.3 million budget.
A City Council proposal to increase filing fees failed this year when it didn't win the unanimous support required to alter the charter. The Charter Commission later took up the issue and voted to send it to the November ballot.
Council Member Blong Yang, who cast one of two votes against the higher fees — the other was Cam Gordon — said his position hasn't changed.
Yang said the proposed changes are "anti-democratic" and "restrictive" measures aimed at ensuring that a large number of people don't run for office, as was the case in the mayor's race.
"I think we should be celebrating that, because democracy is messy," he said. "It was a good thing. To me, when we attack filing fees, that's our mistake. The problem is rank-choice voting."