The proposed passenger rail line from Minneapolis to Duluth is expected to help generate nearly $2 billion in development around five Minnesota stations, including almost $1 billion around the Minneapolis station at the Twins' new ballpark, according to a study presented Tuesday.
A line supporting eight daily trains capable of speeds up to 110 miles per hour would generate 13,833 jobs throughout the corridor, the Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee and Anoka County board were told in separate presentations.
"This is real," said Alex Metcalf, president of Transportation Economics & Management Systems (TEMS), a passenger-rail planning firm based in Rockville, Md., which prepared the study.
And with key players in Washington supporting the proposed line -- including both of Minnesota's U.S. senators, Norm Coleman and Amy Klobuchar, and Minnesota Congressman Jim Oberstar, chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee -- Minnesota has a solid chance of persuading the Federal Railroad Administration to fund 70 to 80 percent of a line that could cost $400 million to complete.
The projected cost of the line, if its trains reach speeds of 110 miles per hour, is $362.6 million, according to the TEMS study. But that figure does not include the cost of building stations or the unspecified amount Burlington Northern Santa Fe will charge for use of its property.
When Metcalf presents the nearly complete, year-long TEMS study to Gov. Tim Pawlenty and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, presumably this week, he will likely emphasize the 889,000 passengers expected to ride the train in 2012, the year the 150-mile line is scheduled to debut.
He will mention the $47 million in additional tax base the line will mean for the state. And he will explain that to obtain federal funding, a passenger line of this magnitude must show positive operating-cost and cost-benefit ratios -- and the TEMS feasibility study of this line, called the Cambridge line, indicates the line will do both.
To secure federal funding, Minnesota officials must show the line is "good for the corridor, good for the state, it's good for America," Metcalf said.