Minneapolis planning commission president steps down

David Motzenbecker, who is a landscape architect with BKV Group, told his colleagues he is stepping down this week, just days before the city's ways and means committee is slated to mull new ethics "best practices" for the city's boards and commissions. Motzenbecker had served on the commission since 2005.

January 19, 2013 at 2:28AM
(The Minnesota Star Tribune)

The president of the city's planning commission, which reviews most major development projects in Minneapolis, is resigning.
David Motzenbecker, a landscape architect with BKV Group, told his colleagues this week that he is stepping down, just days before the city's ways and means committee is slated to mull possible new ethics rules for the city's boards and commissions. Motzenbecker had served on the commission since 2005.

It's unclear if the resignation has any relation to the ethics review, which will be discussed Tuesday. Motzenbecker said in an interview Friday that he was resigning for "personal reasons" and refused to discuss the matter further.

The ethics review was prompted by allegations that planning commissioners, many of whom have full-time jobs in the development industry, were involved in too many projects coming before their own body. Recusals became so common that fellow commissioner Dan Cohen, a former City Council Member, started recusing himself in protest.

Motzenbecker himself was the target of an ethics complaint last year for presenting a project to a neighborhood group and a planning commission committee, before recusing himself at the planning commission vote. The city's ethics board found no conflict-of-interest violation.

Motzenbecker recused himself nine times in 2012.

The city's ethics officer, Susan Trammell, concluded in her review that local officials should not be allowed to address a city board, commission, council committee or the council itself if they have a financial interest that requires disclosure.
Trammell also discovered that commissioners had been using an incorrect conflict of interest form that did not disclose the "nature" of the conflict. They have since begun using the correct form.

about the writer

about the writer

ericroper

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.