Before the balloting for mayoral endorsement started at Saturday's Minneapolis DFL convention, the party's state chair allowed that having no endorsement would be a bad outcome — not for the city or those who seek to lead it, but for the city's strongest political force.
"It really weakens our party if we don't have an endorsement in this mayoral race," DFL chair Ken Martin said.
On Saturday morning, we would have quibbled with Martin. In two of the past three mayoral elections, the DFL made no endorsement. Yet DFL hold on Minneapolis city government today seems stronger than ever.
In fact, this page argued on Jan. 6, days after Mayor R.T. Rybak announced that he would not seek a fourth term, that the DFL would do itself credit if it made no attempt at a conventional endorsement, which requires 60 percent of delegates' votes. We urged either no endorsement or an "endorsement" of more than one candidate, without first exacting a pledge that candidates not chosen would end their bids.
This is the first Minneapolis mayoral election without an incumbent on the ballot in 20 years. Voters deserve to be engaged by a lively contest among competent candidates with competing visions for the city's future.
With at least seven declared mayoral candidates to date, six of them DFLers, and more expected soon, getting 60 percent of 1,400 delegates to settle on one of them was always a long shot, and not a desirable one at that. An endorsement by the city's dominant party likely would have deprived the voters of several strong contenders' voices. A campaign of diminished value would have been the result.
Yet after a very long day Saturday at the Minneapolis Convention Center, we would have conceded the party chair's point in one sense. The city DFL convention did weaken the party — not because it resulted in no endorsement, but because of the way it came to that end.
Saturday's convention put on display an antiquated, manipulation-prone decisionmaking process that did the opposite of what a good political convention should do. Instead of strengthening the standing of a party's candidate or candidates, this convention weakened all the candidates associated with it. We hope the many delegates who went home disgruntled on Saturday night stay unhappy enough to seek changes in the way the DFL seeks to influence election outcomes.