Class warfare among school districts?
Some school officials say that the rich districts are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer -- and that a measure recently introduced in the Legislature would further widen that gap.
At issue is a state law that limits how much property tax revenue a district can raise from its willing voters. That restriction, which dates to the early 1990s, is meant to ensure that all Minnesota students are getting as equitable an education as possible, no matter where they go to school.
But in a year when the Legislature is unlikely to offer new K-12 funding and schools will grasp at any straw to get more money, a few west suburban districts would like that restriction removed. They argue that if their voters are willing to dig more deeply into their pockets for schools, why not let them?
"I just think that if the parents in my districts are willing to vote for a referendum to get more technology or whatever it happens to be, they ought to be able to," said Rep. John Benson, DFL-Minnetonka, sponsor of legislation to get rid of the referendum "cap."
Opponents argue that the measure would create two unequal school systems in Minnesota.
"I think it would be absolutely the wrong way to go," said Brad Lundell, executive director of Schools for Equity in Education, a consortium of districts whose low property values put more of a tax burden on homeowners, making it harder to get voter-approved tax levies. "It does not have a statewide reach. You're going to help a handful of districts and do nothing for the vast number of schoolchildren in Minnesota. ... We will oppose this with every fiber of our being."
'Fighting for survival'