The Last Black Man in San Francisco
⋆⋆⋆½ out of four stars
Rated: R for profanity, nudity and drug use.
Theater: Uptown.
This is a movie about real estate, gentrification cycles and what it means to rage against and embrace the place you call home. Although obviously set in San Francisco, it applies to every city intent on breaking half of its citizens' hearts with each new generation in the housing market.
Jimmie (Jimmie Falls, who co-wrote the script) has been crashing with his best friend, Montgomery (Jonathan Majors). Jimmie's family used to own a grand Victorian house in a historically black neighborhood that has been taken over by wealthy white homeowners. It's Jimmie's defining family story: In 1946, as he has been told all his life, Jimmie's grandfather built the house himself, and for a time Jimmie grew up there, playing its pipe organ, scampering through its many gorgeous hallways.
Now the house is owned by an older white couple, haggling over its ownership with family members. But Jimmie visits the house daily, touching up the paint trim on the exterior, not caring if the owners think he's nuts.
And then, as if in a dream, Jimmie and Montgomery repossess the place and move in. From there, the film asks questions of ownership and familial and cultural legacy recalling such meat-and-potatoes stage works as August Wilson's "The Piano Lesson." The questions might be common, but they also are enormous: Where do I belong? And must every neighborhood change for the worse for so many?
The movie's narrative engine is small and quiet. It takes some time to get the hang of it, and it's sometimes more pictorially impressive than cinematically alive. The feature debut of director/co-writer Joe Talbot, it has a peculiar, sometimes perplexing, often wondrous tone.