With "Jeopardy!" executive producer Mike Richards emerging as the apparent front-runner to replace the late Alex Trebek as host of the long-running quiz show, three lawsuits alleging discrimination and gender-based harassment when he was at "The Price Is Right" are back in the spotlight.
Rumors that Richards was in advanced talks to become the permanent "Jeopardy!" host have come up as competition from higher-profile names including Mayim Bialik, fan fave LeVar Burton and others faded.
Renewed scrutiny of the 46-year-old producer's legal entanglements comes despite his being dismissed as a defendant in one of the suits. The other two were settled out of court. All were filed by models who worked on the TV show "The Price Is Right," where Richards was co-executive producer and then exec producer from 2008 to 2018, before shifting to "Jeopardy!" The lawsuits were filed between 2008 and 2011.
A "Jeopardy!" representative declined to comment on behalf of the show and Richards.
The actions were filed against multiple defendants, including fellow "Price Is Right" producer Adam Sandler and production company Fremantle Media, now known simply as Fremantle. (Sandler is no relation to the "Happy Gilmore" actor who shares his name.)
According to the Hollywood Reporter, in 2010 model Shane Stirling sued producers for wrongful termination, alleging that she was improperly let go in 2008 after she returned from pregnancy leave. That case was dismissed in 2012 after Stirling had trouble bringing sufficient evidence to prove her claims and the judge decided that the statute of limitations had run out.
Also in 2010, model Brandi Cochran sued for wrongful termination, alleging that she got less work after telling producers she was pregnant with twins. One of her twins died in miscarriage while the other was born three months premature and had health issues. Cochran said producers sent her mixed signals about whether she could return to work; then she found out she'd been fired.
A jury initially awarded Cochran more than $8 million, but the judge tossed that out and ordered a new trial after deciding the jury had been improperly instructed. The parties reached an out-of-court settlement in 2016.