Even when enough council members show up for a meeting, the mood at Lakeland's City Hall is contentious.
Over the past four months, two council members have resigned. The three who remain are feuding over how to fill the vacancies. The mayor decided to single-handedly appoint someone to the seat, a move that the city attorney has declared unlawful.
And so the stalemate in the east metro suburb continues, stalling municipal business and eroding the community's faith in its leadership.
"It never came to this before," said Council Member Joe Paiement, who has lived in Lakeland for two decades. "What we have now is a matter of dysfunctional government and widespread distrust."
However crippling, quarrels in municipal governments are not uncommon. Now efforts are ramping up to intervene early before discord threatens progress in city governance and confidence in elected officials.
The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) last summer launched its Collaboration Services program, offering a full-time facilitator to help city councils work together, stay transparent and avoid conflict. The aim is to share best practices in governance and conflict resolution, which can reduce insurance claims made against cities.
In-house mediation rare
The LMC is the only municipal league in the nation to offer such dispute resolution services in-house, though others around the U.S. and Canada have expressed interest in launching similar programs.
"I don't think there's necessarily more [conflict] now, but I think we are paying more attention to it," said Sharon Press, a law professor and director of Mitchell Hamline's Dispute Resolution Institute.