A card that permits a person to use medical marijuana in another state can't make drug charges in Minnesota go up in smoke, the state Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
In December 2011, Jeffrey Thiel was stopped by a state trooper in Itasca County for speeding. After the trooper smelled marijuana, two Mason jars containing the drug were found in his vehicle. Thiel was charged with fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance.
Before his trial in Itasca County District Court, Thiel tried to have the drug evidence suppressed on the grounds that the search was unreasonable and unconstitutional.
Thiel, now 31, also argued that he had a right to introduce as evidence his medical marijuana card from California, which permitted him to possess and use the drug for a medical purpose. That card allowed him to grow 99 plants and to possess 19 pounds of processed marijuana yearly to control chronic pain from injuries and surgeries.
But the prosecution argued that the card was irrelevant and would confuse the jury.
The District Court ruled the card irrelevant and inadmissible. Thiel was found guilty, and court records show he has spent six months in jail in connection to the case.
The Court of Appeals pointed out that Minnesota didn't allow marijuana for medical use at the time of Thiel's arrest and ruled that Minnesota need not incorporate California's decision to permit medical use. A defense based on medical necessity isn't available in Minnesota for a defendant charged with a controlled-substance crime, the court said.
"Although [Thiel's] testimony may have helped explain his conduct to a jury, it would have not excused his conduct, and also would have served to confuse and mislead the jury," the court wrote.