The miserable 5 percent turnout in Tuesday's primary election in St. Paul nicely helps advocates of instant runoff voting in city elections make their case. Low-visibiity city primary elections often produce turnout so low that they cannot be claimed to produce results that reliably reflect majority opinion.
St. Paul voters will be asked on Nov. 3 whether they want to follow the lead of Minneapolis, scrap their primary and conduct a single election using the ranked-choice method that instant runoff voting allows. If the Nov. 3 voters who stayed away from the polls on Tuesday did so out of a sense that primaries ought to be obsolete, instant runoff voting looks like a shoe-in in St. Paul.
More From Star Tribune
More From Opinion
Jen Alger
North Star Promise is an assist for attending college, but navigate carefully
The program is a step in the right direction but comes with some implications.
Martha Jones Sichko
The cost of extremism is why D-Day matters
Next month will bring the 80th anniversary. Remembrance is needed more than ever.
Liz Reyer and John Marty
It's time to remove for-profit HMOs from Minnesota
Our legislation would restore the nonprofit requirement the state removed in 2017.
Letters
Readers Write: Off-road vehicle trails, separation of church and state, student protests at the U
What's wrong with clear signage?
the Editorial Board of the Chicago Tribune
Move to Canada? Better think twice.
The economy is a mess, and Trudeau better reverse the slide if he hopes to remain in office.