It's hard to know where to start in responding to P.A. Jensen's Dec. 12 commentary "For social justice, Coach Reeve should give up one of her jobs." His opinion is that if Minnesota Lynx Coach Cheryl Reeve truly believes in supporting women of color, she should quit one of her jobs (or her wife should) so a woman of color could have the opportunity Cheryl has worked so hard for her entire life.
Really? How about asking Geno Auriemma or one of the other male coaches predominant in NCAA women's basketball to resign so more women can coach women's teams? There are no female basketball head coaches in the NCAA men's game (about 1,000 teams) or in the NBA. Zero, nada. Currently, in the WNBA, there are six male and six female head coaches. Of the 30 NBA teams, none have a female head coach, and just seven have a female assistant coach. The score is 36 to 6 in terms of the professional basketball coach ratio of men to women. (These statistics are readily available by going to the NCAA, NBA and WNBA websites.)
The problem is not that Reeve is the Lynx head coach and general manager and the newly named head coach of the U.S. women's national team. Nor is the problem that her wife, Carley Knox, is the Lynx president of business operations. They are not taking jobs from women of color. Men are. Before Title IX was passed in 1972, 90% of head coaches for college women's teams were women. With Title IX and more money for women's sports, men stepped in. Division I athletic directors are 90% male, and they hire male coaches. That's human nature, and you can't ignore it. People are not fair. Men hire men in sports positions because that's who they are comfortable with.
Reeve has been enormously effective in promoting women and people of color. To say that she should be penalized for that at the height of her amazing career is ridiculous. And by the way, Mr. Jensen, very few coaches select their successor. With the new ownership of the Lynx, it is more likely a male will be hired to succeed Cheryl, whenever that does happen in the future.
Barb Lutz, Minneapolis
THE PANDEMIC
Dismay and more dismay over rejection of the common good
It is a sad reminder of how much the social contract has eroded in modern society that the CEOs of Minnesota's largest health care systems were compelled to take out a full-page add in last Sunday's Star Tribune begging Minnesotans to do our part to stop the spread of COVID-19. It is a message health care workers have been delivering for months, but it is somehow not being heard, or people believe the message does not apply to them as individuals. Our elected officials seem to be unwilling to put aside their petty political differences in the name of public safety and to save our health care system from collapse by putting restrictions such as mask mandates back in place.
The question, then, is whether we — as business owners, corporate CEOs and individual citizens — are willing to answer the call and abide by our social contract to act for the greater good? For all of us who prefer a less intrusive government with less regulation, this is our test, our opportunity to show that we are capable of self-regulation and doing the right thing.
The health care CEOs have asked publicly. I would love to see our local corporate CEOs answer in a similar fashion — tell the health care workers that we hear them, we respect them, we appreciate their being there for us when we need them, and we are going to return the favor by mandating mask-wearing in our stores by everyone no matter their vaccination status, by requiring physical distancing in our facilities, by mandating that our employees be vaccinated, by not traveling unless it is an absolute emergency, and taking any other steps necessary to heed the health care system's call for help.