Defense attorney Peter Wold has seen it time and time again in federal court. A client gets convicted of a low-level role in a drug case, but the judge lacks discretion in sentencing because the charge called for severe mandatory prison time.
That is likely to change after U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday that he's altering Justice Department policy so that fewer low-level, nonviolent drug offenders with no ties to gangs or cartels will be charged with offenses that impose mandatory minimum sentences. He also wants to work with Congress to give judges more discretion in sentencing.
Former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Thomas Heffelfinger praised Holder's effort to reduce the federal prison population, which has grown at a rate of 800 percent in the past 30 years and is running at 40 percent over capacity.
But he's concerned that Holder's directive that each of the country's 94 U.S. attorneys develop local policies to implement his strategy will inevitably mean a lack of consistency.
Holder laid out his plans in remarks to the American Bar Association in San Francisco, and received bipartisan support on Capitol Hill. There are roughly 25,000 drug convictions in federal court each year and 45 percent of those are for lower-level offenses such as street-level dealers and couriers and people who deliver drugs.
"I found his remarks inspiring," said Katherian Roe, chief federal public defender in Minnesota. "I wholeheartedly believe in his effort to forge a more just society."
In Holder's memo to the federal court districts, he made it clear he still wants mandatory minimum sentences, but not in as many cases, Roe said. A key factor in deciding to use such sentences or statutes should include whether the defendant has a significant criminal history, the memo said.
On the federal level, a significant history usually consists of offenses that add up to three or more "points" on a criminal scale. A drunken-driving charge and two disorderly charges in the previous 10 years could reach that total, said Roe.