Every year, Boynton Health Services at the University of Minnesota surveys the state's college students to see how academic performance is affected by lifestyle factors such as stress, lack of sleep and drug use. And each year, director Ed Ehlinger and his staff notice a powerful correlation: students with health insurance get better grades.
Ehlinger can't prove it's cause-and-effect, but he thinks the link is strong enough that colleges should consider requiring health coverage as a way to improve academic achievement. Many schools do, but he estimates that one in six Minnesota college students is uninsured.
The U has required insurance for decades, but recently two other schools -- the University of St. Thomas and Minnesota State University Moorhead -- have begun experiments with mandatory coverage.
The result, playing out at several campuses across the state, is a microcosm of the national health care debate in Washington: Do the benefits of universal health insurance outweigh the costs?
St. Thomas, which dropped mandatory insurance after the paperwork became too much to handle, reinstated the policy in 2007.
"We were very worried about our uninsured rate," said Madonna McDermott, director of the Student Health and Wellness Center. Officials worried about whether students would get medical care when ill -- and how they would pay for it -- without insurance, she said.
St. Thomas likes the results so far: Students are getting more preventive care, more timely services and appropriate tests, McDermott said. In addition, premiums dropped because costs are now spread across a larger, healthier pool of students. That addressed what is known as the "adverse selection" problem: When insurance is voluntary, the people most likely to buy it are those with health problems, which drives up costs and premiums.
About 10 percent of St. Thomas students use the school-sponsored plan.