We were sitting in a nice little St. Paul burger shop the other evening, and I noticed something: Everyone was wearing a parka.
Oh, the cafe had the heat on; the waitress wasn't going around the tables with a flamethrower, saying, "Need a warm-up on those fries?" But every time the door opened it was like a gust of razor blades from the Yukon.
You wore your coat to keep your teeth from chattering, which makes it difficult to eat a hamburger. There's timing involved.
So I was amused when I saw a headline on a news website: IT'S COLD, BUT IT COULD BE WORSE.
Yes, of course. If the sun winked out at noon the weatherperson would say, "Well, high of 4 above today, with overnight lows dipping down to minus-200 degrees in the Arrowhead. By noon tomorrow the heat of the Earth will quickly dissipate until we hit 439-below. At that point all molecular activity ceases, so expect a slow drive home."
It could be like the winter of 1996, which was colder, but information like that is akin to hitting your thumb with a hammer and thinking, "When I did the same thing in 1987, it hurt more." Doesn't change the present situation.
It was worse when glaciers covered much of the state. They moved slowly; they were no surprise to anyone. They didn't blow the Glacier Sirens when they saw one 50 miles off. If a glacier caught the bottom of your mammoth-skin coat, of course, you'd be worried. Help! It's got me! It'll run right over me in six to seven years! Help!
Yes, it could be worse. You can't really complain about the brutal purity of December thus far; it's preferable to the glum slump of a brown Christmas. But you have to feel bad for people who are spending their first winter here and panic the first time they can't feel their feet. Folks get used to having all their toes report in as "present," I suppose.