Oh, no: I got in an argument about masks.
Oh, no, you quietly think: "I kinda liked this guy. Thought well of him. Silly fellow, sure, but he's not one of ... one of those, is he?"
No, I'm not. There. Feel better?
You think: "No, because you didn't say whether you're on the side that thinks masks are meaningless theater designed to bring about a compliant, sheeplike population that gives up its constitutional right to exhale unimpeded, or the side that believes all possible social approbation should be brought down on people who don't wear a mask in the car. What if you gave it to the radio announcer?"
That's right, I didn't specify which of those options applied, because those are polarizing descriptions of the mask debate, which is growing louder as more Minnesota cities debate mandatory masks. But if you wonder what side I'm on, I believe the words "mask" and "debate" should've been socially distanced long ago. It's like having an "umbrella debate" when it's been hailing daily for four months.
I hardly think the masks are a bulletproof solution, unless they're made of Kevlar. But I've been wearing one since this whole thing began, and let me tell you, do I have a weird looking beard now. I have calluses around the back of my ears. So what was the argument about?
Why I don't have a permanent personal mask.
My explanation: I don't want to participate in mask culture.