Justin Bieber says Mister Senator Klobuchar should be sent to jail. Informed that the senator has a bill that would slap felony charges on people who upload copyright material to make a buck, he called her a "guy," then, upon learning such niggling particulars as her gender, he added, "Whoever she is, she needs to know that I'm saying she needs to be locked up, put away in cuffs."
There's a reason the Constitution maintains a strict wall of separation between the legislative and the singing branches of society: Entertainers are often too busy figuring out new ways to express primordial desires to get up to speed on the details of the law.
Bieber was asked by an interviewer about legislation sponsored by Sen. K that would make it a felony to profit from streaming copyright stuff. He was under the mistaken impression the law would affect ordinary folk who sing songs and put them on YouTube. It does not. (To which one says: Well, there's a missed opportunity.) It's just going after crooks.
Will it work? People already download this stuff from people who aren't making a profit. They think they're entitled to it, because it's ... well, it's just out there, and no one's getting hurt.
A sizeable portion of Internet users believe paying for anything on the Internet violates the spirit of the Web; it should be an Old Country Buffet that not only doesn't charge, but doesn't mind if you bring in a bucket and load up the potato salad for later.
The law might be overreaching -- YouTube already scans your uploads for copyright stuff and yanks the accounts of people who pirate -- and it'll do nothing about the great sewers of piracy that thrive in Europe.
But it reminds people that stuff costs money for a good reason. It costs money to make the stuff, and the people who make it often have this strange, stubborn desire to NOT STARVE.
Which brings us to the Star Tribune's new online limitations. (Bieber had no comment on this.)