How much art can you get for half a million dollars? When the venerable street gets its 21st-century makeover, $500,000 will be spent on a "signature" piece of art. Let's cut right to the expected reactions.
The perpetually aggravated Internet commenter: Oh great another boondoggle they think will stop the city from goin' down the tubes!!! Seriously? Taxes go up and up and theres a street sign in my neighborhood that has been leaning at a 30 degree angle for MONTHS and no one does anything. Maybe that's art now LOL
The career politician: I regard this as a great opportunity to give Minneapolis a world-class, iconic, place-defining piece of destination art that will make people reject Paris as a destination and come here to stand in front of some stacked rocks and look at the plaque that has my name on it.
The artist: As someone who's been exploring the historical relationships between mass-produced materials like cardboard and drywall, using them to explore the way we see ourselves and the world, can you tell me how the heck I can get a piece of this?
I hope it's a pleasure to behold. If it's a big abstract pile of steel with a name like "Tetanus #7," no one will like it except for people who find raw poetry in the unmediated use of industrial materials, and are also the artist's girlfriend. If I may make a few suggestions to avoid tendentious ugliness:
A giant fork with a blueberry on the end. This would echo the much-beloved "Spoonbridge and Cherry," and make subsequent decisions on public art much easier. A huge knife cutting through a 10-foot-tall pat of butter, for example, would be a natural addition, as would a 75-foot handle for a gravy ladle sticking out of Lake Harriet.
After a while they'd be down to pickle forks and sugar tongs, but we would be the only city whose public art consisted of a complete set of cutlery.
Obviously, the days of putting civic figures on horses on a pedestal have passed, but: Hubert Humphrey poppin' a wheelie on a Harley would be awesome.