SENATE RECOUNT
Avoid partisan poison of Washington state
The parallel drawn between Washington's 2004 gubernatorial race and our current Senate race in the Nov. 12 letter from a Tacoma, Wash., writer ("Sounds a little like 2004 Washington") was familiar to me. Familiar, too, was the tone.
I arrived in Washington state for college in 2004 and saw for the past four years how much bitterness was left in the state. I agree that we can take lessons from Washington's recount and, yes, caution with how we count the ballots is one of the them. But the most important lesson is that it does a state no good when the losing party remains angry for years and the winning party finds they've won a seat with missing legs.
In Washington, the real winner of the '04 governor's race was partisan bitterness. Let's treat our own tight race like what it is -- a rare symptom of a well-balanced state -- and not an excuse to drag campaign-season accusations through the next six years.
LISA WAANANEN, MAPLE GROVE
•••
Katherine Kersten writes in her Nov. 12 column that the recount is tainted by the fact the state attorney general is from the DFL Party. Methinks she would be silent on this subject if the office were held by a Republican!
SUZANNE BALZER, MINNEAPOLIS
RACIAL PROGRESS AND GOP
Has anybody seen a Dixiecrat lately?
Regarding "You can thank the GOP for racial progress (Opinion Exchange, Nov. 12): Mitch Pearlstein's opening argument was based on the cynical claim of higher Republican voting percentages for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We don't have to be too old to know how disingenuous that claim is.