ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICIES
One size may not fit
all individual students
I was dismayed and angry to read about the Blaine High School senior who may be expelled for the remainder of the year under the school's "zero-tolerance" weapons policy for inadvertently leaving a box cutter he used at his after-school job in his car in the school's parking lot (front page, Sept. 18).
While no one questions the need for schools to take a strong stance against weapons possession, where is the judgment here?
"Zero-tolerance" policies should not mean that schools cannot evaluate each situation for its unique characteristics and exercise some discernment about the best response. Anything less is a gross disservice to students and displays the kind of rigidity that serves no one well. Surely a one-day suspension and a stern reminder of the policy would have been more than adequate here.
Anyone who works with kids knows that sometimes a single event, badly handled -- especially including expulsion from school -- can mean the difference between success and failure for a student for the rest of his teenage years. A little time spent actually thinking about individual kids and their conduct in these situations is not too much to ask of our schools.
PHEBE HAUGEN, EDINA
•••
The article quotes a school official saying, "We try to apply these policies in a uniform way to all students. It isn't fair to them if we don't." This individual has confused "fair" with "equal."
If you treat everyone the same way, that is treating them equally. If, on the other hand, you allow authorities to use their best professional judgment and take into account the relevant circumstances, that can lead to treating people fairly. It is not the same thing.