Letter of the Day (May 5): Bonding bill

May 4, 2013 at 10:17PM
Rep. Bev Scalze, DFL Little Canada, greeted Union members who chanted "Build it! Build it!" outside the House chamber where they were discussing the bonding bill at the Capitol Thursday, May 3, 2012.
Rep. Bev Scalze, DFL Little Canada, greeted Union members who chanted "Build it! Build it!" outside the House chamber where they were discussing the bonding bill at the Capitol Thursday, May 3, 2012. (Star Tribune/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Should the Legislature pass a bonding bill this year? ("To bond or not to bond? Communities await news," May 2.) Without a doubt, the answer is yes because the historically low interest rates and the very competitive bid prices that contractors are offering means getting more value for our dollars.

In addition, more construction work means more employment and more sales for various supporting businesses. Finally, the multiplier effect of local spending means those dollars provide nearly twice the value, if not more, as the original dollars that are spent are respent.

There are many worthwhile, ready-to-go projects that are waiting for the state to be a partner. Plus, a bonding bill can be done and still stay within the state's financial parameters.

This positive climate is not going to last indefinitely. With all the advantages and little, if any, downside, this is a year to make investments in Minnesota and help improve the state's economy and employment picture.

Let's hope that politics won't get in the way.

STEVE COOK, Hutchinson, Minn.

The writer is Hutchinson's mayor.

about the writer

about the writer

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.