We recently visited the Interstate 35W Memorial in Minneapolis. A guide described the tragedy that occurred on Aug. 1, 2007. He had sharp memories of the event and was able to provide all of the facts on the bridge collapse and the loss of life. But memories disappear with the passage of time, which could diminish the impact of the bridge memorial for future generations. I suggest that a plaque describing the event be affixed to the I-35W memorial, making it meaningful to visitors for many years to come. We know how the 13 victims died, but how will future generations know? A plaque describing the collapse would honor the memories of the victims long after we're gone.
RUTH BARTLING, MINNEAPOLIS
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More From Star Tribune
More From Opinion
Editorial
BWCA's future likely hinges on election
The reckless bill to rescind copper mining protections in the watershed that passed the U.S. House panders to foreign mine owners. Its fate now rests with voters.
Al Zdon
Saving the dinosaurs: Why there's a future for community newspapers
Three factors that could help with a resurrection.
Letters
Readers Write: Gun storage laws, Uber and Lyft, 24/7 businesses, the pipe organ
A flawed, burdensome proposal on guns.
Ron Way
Reactions to Mary Moriarty's work: A familiar arc for a reformer
Support went cold at high levels after she began handling prosecutions as she promised she would (and as is necessary).