Jennifer Brooks
There are so many liquor bills coming up for debate in the Legislature this week, we may have to card you before you read this column.
The House Commerce Committee is set to roll out the liquor omnibus bill, its annual collection of less-controversial alcohol-related measures. Among the bills vying for inclusion in this year's omnibus is a proposal to make beer more available at more sports venues at the University of Minnesota.
Last year, the Legislature agreed to allow beer sales in TCF Bank Stadium if the university board approved the move, which it did. This year, Rep. Dan Schoen, DFL-St. Paul Park, wants to open up alcohol sales to the hockey and basketball fans in the cheap seats at Mariucci and Williams arenas, too.
So much for the less-controversial bills. Other liquor bills floating around the Capitol this session have come in for more, ahem, spirited debate.
Rep. Karen Clark, DFL-Minneapolis, sparked one of those debates on the House floor last week with a bill that would hike the excise tax on liquor for the first time since 1987. The increases would be 55 percent on liquor, more than 700 percent on wine and almost 500 percent on beer. That, Clark noted, amounts to 59 cents per liter on wine and $3.38 per liter on spirits — or pennies per glass.
She hopes to dedicate the estimated $190 million a year in additional tax revenue to courts, law enforcement agencies and treatment centers that deal with the social costs of alcohol abuse. But opponents say the bill is a staggering tax increase.
"A gallon of wine? We call that lunch," Rep. Greg Davids, R-Preston, joked during floor debate after Clark described the per-glass increase — about 9 cents for wine, 3 cents for beer and 10 cents for liquor — as modest.