MADISON, Wis. — Two Republican legislators started moving a package of proposals to toughen Wisconsin's drunken driving penalties through the state Assembly on Thursday, saying lawmakers must signal that repeat offenses won't be tolerated.
Rep. Jim Ott and Sen. Alberta Darling presented three bills to the Assembly Judiciary Committee during a public hearing. One would change third and fourth offenses from misdemeanors to felonies. Another would create mandatory sentences ranging from six months in jail to three years in prison for injuring someone in a drunken crash. The third would impose a mandatory 10-year prison sentence for killing someone while driving drunk.
The measures carry price tags in the tens of millions of dollars for prosecutors and the state's prison system. The committee didn't take any action on the bills and their prospects look uncertain at best.
"The bills before us have merit," said committee member Rep. Gary Hebl, D-Sun Prairie. "The concerns I have is the fiscal note is almost prohibitive. ... It's a lot of money."
Ott, R-Mequon, and Darling, R-River Hills, were undaunted, telling the committee the time has come to crack down.
"It's time we start balancing the scale of justice with what's happening to the victims," Darling said.
Drinking is woven into Wisconsin's culture, leading to major problems on the road. The state Department of Transportation has tracked nearly 2,800 fatal crashes and nearly 40,000 injury crashes involving alcohol between 2002 and last year. Data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shows 23 percent of drivers involved in fatal crashes in Wisconsin in 2011 had a blood-alcohol content of at least 0.08 percent — that's the highest percentage of drivers in a region that included Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota and Ohio.
But the state's drunken driving laws remain famously lax. Wisconsin, for example, is the only state where a first offense isn't a crime; it's treated as a civil violation akin to a speeding ticket. Prohibitive cost estimates and push-back from powerful Tavern League lobbyists have stymied harsher penalties.