From diminished habitat and threatened wildlife, vexing challenges face Minnesota's outdoors. Also much-publicized are questions of just who will use and protect the state's rich heritage in the years to come.
Hunters and anglers are the primary source of funding for wildlife conservation through license fees. All told, hunters spent $725 million in Minnesota on their sport in 2015. Their numbers, however, are declining. The majority of the hunting-fishing population in Minnesota is older, white and male in a state whose population is trending younger and more diverse.
"Most of us in conservation do not look like America," said Dan Ashe, former director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, last year. "We do not, therefore, adequately represent America."
He feels the same way today: A new approach is needed to connect future generations with nature.
"Children have many more choices today on how they are going to spend their free time," said Ashe, who is now the chief executive of the Association of Zoos & Aquariums. "What we have to do, we have to capture that free time in as many possible ways as we can."
Before Ashe retired from the wildlife agency he started an urban initiative to try to improve on recruitment. His goal: Get people out of the city and visiting national parks, wildlife refuges and forests.
"If [young people] are spending more time in a connected environment," Ashe said, "we've got to grab them where they are and provide them with easy opportunities to use that at as a gateway and maybe get them to say, 'Maybe I was meant to learn how to fish, to backpack or hike, or camp.' "
Some of those who advocate like Ashe are trying to point to an even deeper importance, one that's personal.