When the gavel drops Monday morning in room 840 of the Ramsey County Courthouse, Koua Fong Lee knows his future is now.
If his attorneys Brent Schafer and Bob Hilliard prevail at the evidentiary hearing, he could be released from prison, where he is serving eight years for criminal vehicular homicide, and reunited with his wife and four children pending a new trial. If they don't, Lee probably will go back to Lino Lakes prison until his scheduled supervised release date in February 2013.
Lee's case arose from a horrific collision in St. Paul on the afternoon of June 10, 2006. He was driving his family home from Minneapolis in a 1996 Toyota Camry. The car slowed as he took the Snelling Avenue exit off eastbound Interstate 94, but then sped up as he reached the top of the ramp.
Lee yelled to his family that the brakes didn't work. He sideswiped several other cars stopped at a red light, then slammed into the back of an Oldsmobile Ciera. The driver, Javis Adams Sr., 33, and his son, Javis Jr., 9, died at the scene. Adams' father, Quincy, and his daughter, Jassmine, were injured. Adams' niece, Devyn Bolton, was left a quadriplegic and died soon after the trial at age 7.
Although Lee insisted he had hit the brakes, not the accelerator, his trial attorney told the jury Lee probably mistakenly hit the gas pedal.
Lee's attorneys are seeking a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence and claiming ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial. Prosecutors, who proved Lee's guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt" at his 2007 trial, oppose a new trial. This time, the burden of proof "by a preponderance of the evidence" rests on the defense.
"I want to remind people that, unlike at a trial where it is our burden to prove the question at issue and produce witnesses to make that case, now that a conviction has been had, it is the defense's responsibility to produce any evidence that might put that conviction into question," County Attorney Susan Gaertner said.
But, she said, "The standard of proof necessary to raise a doubt about a previous conviction is lower than the standard to get a conviction in the first place. It's just another example of how the system and its rules err on the side of the defendant's rights."